Billary Clinton. Why we must do better than Recycling the Clinton Administration
You can’t blame Hillary. If you want to win the presidency of the United States, you go with known, proven quantities. Its not a surprise, then, that she is already working with Mark Penn, the talented democratic pollster that is presently pulling her puppet strings in an attempt to make her likeable. Read about it here. Clearly, this is what we can expect from a 3rd term Billary Clinton presidency: recycling of much of the same “talent” and insider politics that drove the first and second Billary administrations.
Hey Mark! Here’s some data for your spreadsheet.
Moderate liberals, who will be the king makers in this next election, do not pine for the glory days of good ol’ boy Bill Clinton. I won’t pick him apart here, but suffice it to say, 8 years of Bill in the Whitehouse is enough.
Six years into Bush II, there is no doubt to moderate liberals that recycling ANY presidental talent for a third term is NEVER a good idea. It wasn’t a good idea when Reganites wanted a third term for Ronald. It certainly wasn’t a good idea when Dubya brought in Daddy’s old friends, and it’s not a good idea now for a recycled “Billary” administration.
The concerns that I have are exactly what we’ve seen: that family politics will result in a political dynasty that will harm America.
America could have done better than Dubya. America MUST do better than Billary. There is better talent in the field, clearly, in the candidacies of John Edwards and BarakO. We don’t have to recycle the Clinton family, and we must find a new direction in 2008.
Mark, you can poll all you want. You can have her say whatever you want. But America will NEVER go for Billary Clinton.